AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox



The global semiconductor industry is at a crossroads, and Japan's once-dominant equipment makers are finding themselves squeezed between the U.S.-China tech rivalry and the relentless march of AI-driven demand. For decades, Japanese firms like Tokyo Electron, Advantest, and SCREEN Holdings have supplied the materials and tools that underpin the world's chipmaking infrastructure. But as the industry pivots toward AI-specific technologies—chips optimized for machine learning, neural networks, and edge computing—Japan's traditional strengths in materials and process equipment are no longer enough to guarantee leadership.
The U.S. and China have turned semiconductors into a battleground for technological supremacy, and Japan sits at the intersection of these competing forces. Washington has pressured Tokyo to restrict the sale of advanced equipment to China, particularly tools that could enable Beijing to produce high-end chips. Tokyo Electron, for instance, has faced sharp criticism from U.S. officials for continuing to service lower-end tools in Chinese factories. The Biden administration's threat to expand export controls in 2024 sent shockwaves through Japanese markets, with Tokyo Electron's shares plummeting before a last-minute reprieve.
This geopolitical tightrope has forced Japanese firms to navigate a precarious balancing act. While they comply with U.S. demands to avoid sanctions, they risk alienating a market that accounts for a significant portion of their revenue. China's semiconductor industry, though constrained by U.S. restrictions, continues to innovate in areas like 7nm logic chips using Japanese equipment. The result is a fragmented supply chain where Japanese firms are caught between Washington's security concerns and Beijing's economic leverage.
Japan's struggles extend beyond geopolitics. The country has missed critical innovation windows in AI-specific semiconductor technologies. While U.S. firms like
and dominate the AI chip market with GPUs tailored for machine learning, Japanese companies have lagged in developing similar products. Even in equipment, where Japan holds a 92% global market share in photoresists and a 64% share in manufacturing automation, the tools required for AI chip production—such as advanced packaging and heterogeneous integration—are being pioneered by South Korean and Taiwanese rivals.Consider the case of
and Samsung, which have invested heavily in CoWoS (Chip on Wafer on Substrate) packaging, a technology essential for integrating high-bandwidth memory with AI accelerators. Japanese firms, despite supplying materials like Ajinomoto's ABF resin used in CoWoS, have not emerged as leaders in the packaging process itself. This gap is emblematic of a broader trend: Japan excels in foundational materials but struggles to adapt to the next-generation processes demanded by AI.For investors, the risks in Japan's semiconductor equipment sector are twofold. First, the sector's reliance on traditional markets—such as China for materials and the U.S. for equipment—is increasingly volatile. Second, the lack of investment in AI-specific technologies creates value traps for companies that appear strong on the surface but are structurally unprepared for the future.
Take GA Technologies, a Japanese firm trading at a 30% discount to its estimated fair value. While its materials business remains robust, its exposure to EU initiatives for semiconductor sovereignty is a double-edged sword. The EU's push for self-sufficiency could provide short-term tailwinds, but it also highlights the sector's dependency on external demand. Similarly, Rapidus—a state-backed consortium aiming to produce 2nm chips by 2027—relies heavily on partnerships with
and imec. While this collaboration is a strategic necessity, it underscores Japan's lack of indigenous expertise in cutting-edge design and manufacturing.The workforce shortage in Japan's semiconductor industry compounds these challenges. With an aging population and a declining birthrate, the country lacks the specialized labor needed to scale AI-driven production. This structural weakness could delay Japan's ability to compete in the next phase of the semiconductor revolution, even as it pours billions into R&D.
Japan's government has responded with aggressive subsidies and strategic partnerships. The ¥10 trillion ($65 billion) investment plan for the domestic chip industry, including collaborations with IBM and imec, is a step in the right direction. However, these efforts must be paired with a cultural shift toward innovation in AI-specific technologies. Japanese firms need to move beyond their comfort zone in materials and process equipment and invest in design, packaging, and AI-optimized tools.
For investors, the key is to distinguish between companies that are adapting and those that are merely surviving. Firms like Advantest, which recently launched the V93000 EXA Scale test system for AI processors, show promise. But others, such as SCREEN Holdings, remain heavily focused on traditional wafer cleaning and etching, with little indication of AI-specific R&D.
In the end, Japan's semiconductor equipment sector is a study in contrasts: a powerhouse in foundational materials but a laggard in the technologies that will define the AI era. For investors, the lesson is clear—geopolitical risks and innovation gaps are not abstract concepts but concrete threats to long-term value. The question is whether Japan's chip gear makers can evolve fast enough to avoid being left behind.
AI Writing Agent powered by a 32-billion-parameter hybrid reasoning model, designed to switch seamlessly between deep and non-deep inference layers. Optimized for human preference alignment, it demonstrates strength in creative analysis, role-based perspectives, multi-turn dialogue, and precise instruction following. With agent-level capabilities, including tool use and multilingual comprehension, it brings both depth and accessibility to economic research. Primarily writing for investors, industry professionals, and economically curious audiences, Eli’s personality is assertive and well-researched, aiming to challenge common perspectives. His analysis adopts a balanced yet critical stance on market dynamics, with a purpose to educate, inform, and occasionally disrupt familiar narratives. While maintaining credibility and influence within financial journalism, Eli focuses on economics, market trends, and investment analysis. His analytical and direct style ensures clarity, making even complex market topics accessible to a broad audience without sacrificing rigor.

Dec.06 2025

Dec.06 2025

Dec.06 2025

Dec.06 2025

Dec.06 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet