From Diplomacy to Defiance: China's Hardening Stance Against U.S. Tariffs
3min read The U.S.-China trade relationship has evolved from a contentious but negotiable rivalry under Trump’s first term to a posture of unyielding defiance by China in 2025. This shift—from initial efforts to resolve disputes through agreements like the Phase One Trade Deal to Beijing’s outright refusal to back down in the face of escalating tariffs—reflects a strategic recalibration. Below, we dissect the trajectory, its economic impacts, and implications for global investors.
Ask Aime: What impact will the U.S.-China trade relationship's shift have on the global economy?
The Trump Era: A Fragile Truce (2018–2020)
The trade war began in July 2018 when the U.S. imposed tariffs on $34 billion of Chinese goods, triggering retaliatory measures. By 2020, tariffs covered $550 billion of Chinese imports, while China levied $185 billion in duties on U.S. goods. The Phase One Agreement in January 2020 temporarily eased tensions, reducing U.S. tariffs to 7.5% and requiring China to purchase an additional $200 billion in U.S. goods over two years.
However, compliance faltered. By August 2020, China had fulfilled less than 25% of its 2020 purchase commitments, while geopolitical disputes over Hong Kong and tech sanctions on Huawei strained relations. The truce was fragile, masking deeper structural disagreements over IP, market access, and industrial policies.
Biden’s Technological Siege (2021–2024)
The Biden administration shifted focus to strategic decoupling, targeting China’s technological ambitions. Key actions included:
- Semiconductor Restrictions: In 2024, the U.S. banned exports of advanced chips and equipment to China, adding 140 entities to the Entity List.
- Forced Labor Sanctions: The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) expanded to 107 entities by 2024, including steel and food producers.
- Investment Bans: Rules blocked U.S. capital from funding Chinese tech sectors like AI and quantum computing.
China retaliated by imposing export controls on critical raw materials (gallium, germanium) and banning U.S. defense firms over arms sales to Taiwan.
The tech decoupling disrupted global supply chains, with semiconductor shortages impacting industries from autos to consumer electronics. China’s response signaled a new era of reciprocal retaliation.
2025 Escalation: Defiance and Mutual Destruction
Under Trump’s second term, tariffs surged to unprecedented levels. By April 2025:
- The U.S. levied a 125% tariff on Chinese imports, ending duty-free treatment for low-value shipments.
- China retaliated with an 84% tariff on U.S. goods, vowing to “fight to the end” against what it called “economic bullying.”
Beijing framed its defiance as a defense of sovereignty, while the U.S. labeled China a “bad actor.” Analysts noted the move isolated China, excluding it from a 90-day tariff pause for 75 other nations.
Economic Fallout and Strategic Adjustments
The consequences were immediate and severe:
- China’s Growth Outlook: Goldman Sachs projected a 2.4% drag on China’s 2025 GDP, revising growth to 4.5%—below Beijing’s 5% target. Fitch downgraded China’s credit rating in April 2025 due to rising government debt.
- Market Reactions: China’s Shanghai Composite dipped initially but stabilized, gaining 1.1% on April 9, 2025. U.S. markets surged post-tariff pause, with the Nasdaq jumping 10%.
- Currency and Trade Shifts: China hinted at yuan depreciation to offset costs, while rerouting exports through Southeast Asia faced limits due to Trump’s global tariff expansions.
Conclusion: A New Era of Strategic Competition
China’s shift from negotiation to defiance reflects a calculated strategy to safeguard its economic sovereignty amid U.S. containment. Investors must grapple with:
1. Sectoral Risks: Tech and semiconductor firms face prolonged supply chain disruptions. U.S. defense stocks like Raytheon (RTN) and BAE Systems (BAESY) saw asset freezes in China.
2. Market Volatility: The Shanghai Composite (SHCOMP) and Nasdaq (COMP) will remain sensitive to tariff cycles, with geopolitical headlines driving swings.
3. Policy Uncertainty: Biden’s PNTR revocation proposal and Trump’s 2025 tariffs underscore a bipartisan hardening of U.S. stance, unlikely to ease soon.
The path forward is fraught. While China’s 2025 defiance protects its autonomy, it risks deeper economic isolation. For investors, hedging against volatility and favoring firms with diversified supply chains (e.g., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM)) or exposure to China’s domestic stimulus (e.g., Pinduoduo (PDD)) may mitigate risks. The trade war’s next chapter hinges on whether either side can redefine competition without mutual destruction.
In this landscape, patience and adaptability are paramount. As one analyst noted, “The U.S.-China relationship is no longer about trade—it’s about who writes the rules of the 21st century.” For investors, the rules are clear: diversify, anticipate escalation, and brace for prolonged turbulence.
