Advanced Charting With AI Automation

Confused by candlesticks? With automatic pattern recognition, AIME scans the chart, draws the lines, and tells you straight: bullish or bearish, while revealing the news behind every move.

Discover our new collection of lightweight essenti

Run the Backtest With AI Precision

Turn past reactions into smarter trades today. AIME digs into years of market data, grouping similar events like earnings calls or FOMC meetings, and calculates the results for you — win rates, max gains, and worst-case drawdowns. Want to test a custom strategy? Just ask Aime!

Newswire

Fast, factual, and for you. Your AI-powered real-time news engine.

Live Stream

Stay on pulse with real-time event coverage. From breaking headlines to live market reactions.

Expert Insights

Gain clear insights and fresh ideas from top analysts through deep, actionable market analysis.

Podcasts

Conversations that think — where markets meet discussion.

Market Dashboard

Your All-in-One Hub for Smarter Investing. Stay ahead with World News, Earnings, Macro Insights, and Portfolio Tracking — all in one place. Soon, get AI-powered recommendations tailored just for you!

How should I invest in Recursion Pharmaceuticals now?

Crypto Boom Ignites: Has the Tipping Point Arrived with Strategy soaring nearly 10%?

How can Nebius' low-price strategy in Europe challenge CoreWeave's AI supremacy in North America?

What impact will the recent international situation have on the US stock market？

<h2>Takeaways:</h2><ul><li>Historic Rally: Gold surged to an all-time high near $4,960/oz, gaining over 15% YTD, driven by a 0.8% drop in the dollar and fears over the Federal Reserve’s political independence.</li><li>Revised Forecasts: Goldman Sachs raised its year-end gold price target to $5,400 from $4,900, citing intensifying demand from private investors and central banks hedging against global policy uncertainty.</li><li>Geopolitical Catalysts: Escalating tensions in Venezuela, Iran, and the unfolding Greenland crisis are fueling a &quot;debasement trade,&quot; prompting capital rotation from sovereign bonds into hard assets like bullion.</li></ul><visualization data='{&quot;components&quot;:[{&quot;uuid&quot;:&quot;5db05d87c9c881eb&quot;,&quot;config&quot;:{&quot;image&quot;:&quot;https://lh-prod-mid-pub-newsf10.s3.amazonaws.com/logo/etf/T004753911.png&quot;,&quot;marketTag&quot;:&quot;NYSE&quot;,&quot;show_type_id&quot;:702,&quot;tradeClass&quot;:&quot;closed&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;KxxV2&quot;,&quot;fsType&quot;:&quot;closed&quot;,&quot;showBottom&quot;:true,&quot;showCodeContrast&quot;:false,&quot;score&quot;:20,&quot;show_type&quot;:&quot;kline3&quot;,&quot;maLine&quot;:[5,10,30,60],&quot;moduleList&quot;:[],&quot;variety&quot;:&quot;ETF&quot;,&quot;scoreRuleNames&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;tradeStatus&quot;:&quot;trading&quot;,&quot;codeName&quot;:&quot;Name&quot;,&quot;klineDefaultType&quot;:&quot;fs&quot;,&quot;title_config&quot;:{&quot;config&quot;:{&quot;display&quot;:true,&quot;display2&quot;:false,&quot;txt_style&quot;:0,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;&quot;},&quot;data&quot;:{&quot;h1&quot;:&quot;GLD Trend&quot;,&quot;h2&quot;:&quot;&quot;},&quot;show_type&quot;:&quot;title1&quot;}},&quot;data&quot;:{&quot;chunks_info&quot;:&quot;[]&quot;,&quot;code_count&quot;:1,&quot;columns&quot;:[{&quot;index_name&quot;:&quot;market_code&quot;,&quot;key&quot;:&quot;market_code&quot;,&quot;label&quot;:&quot;market_code&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;STR&quot;},{&quot;index_name&quot;:&quot;code&quot;,&quot;key&quot;:&quot;code&quot;,&quot;label&quot;:&quot;hq_code&quot;,&quot;source&quot;:&quot;fixed_index&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;STR&quot;},{&quot;domain&quot;:&quot;abs_xxxxetfxx&quot;,&quot;feKey&quot;:&quot;Ticker&quot;,&quot;index_name&quot;:&quot;Ticker&quot;,&quot;key&quot;:&quot;Ticker&quot;,&quot;label&quot;:&quot;code&quot;,&quot;origin_index&quot;:&quot;etf code&quot;,&quot;source&quot;:&quot;fixed_index&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;STR&quot;,&quot;unit&quot;:&quot;&quot;},{&quot;domain&quot;:&quot;abs_xxxxetfxx&quot;,&quot;feKey&quot;:&quot;Name&quot;,&quot;index_name&quot;:&quot;Name&quot;,&quot;key&quot;:&quot;Name&quot;,&quot;label&quot;:&quot;name&quot;,&quot;origin_index&quot;:&quot;etf name&quot;,&quot;source&quot;:&quot;fixed_index&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;STR&quot;,&quot;unit&quot;:&quot;&quot;},{&quot;feKey&quot;:&quot;Date&quot;,&quot;index_name&quot;:&quot;Date&quot;,&quot;key&quot;:&quot;Date&quot;,&quot;label&quot;:&quot;date&quot;,&quot;origin_index&quot;:&quot;Date&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;DATE&quot;},{&quot;domain&quot;:&quot;abs_xxxxetfxx&quot;,&quot;feKey&quot;:&quot;Closing Price&quot;,&quot;index_name&quot;:&quot;xxxxetf@Closing Price&quot;,&quot;key&quot;:&quot;Closing Price&quot;,&quot;label&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;report_type&quot;:&quot;TRADE_DAILY&quot;,&quot;source&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;timestamp&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;DOUBLE&quot;,&quot;unit&quot;:&quot;USD&quot;}],&quot;condition&quot;:&quot;[{\&quot;sonSize\&quot;:2,\&quot;opName\&quot;:\&quot;and\&quot;,\&quot;relatedSize\&quot;:0},{\&quot;sonSize\&quot;:0,\&quot;indexName\&quot;:\&quot;xxxxetf@etf code\&quot;,\&quot;indexProperties\&quot;:[\&quot;EQUAL GLD.P\&quot;],\&quot;indexPropertiesMap\&quot;:{\&quot;EQUAL\&quot;:\&quot;GLD.P\&quot;},\&quot;domain\&quot;:\&quot;abs_xxxxetfxx\&quot;,\&quot;relatedSize\&quot;:0},{\&quot;sonSize\&quot;:0,\&quot;indexName\&quot;:\&quot;xxxxetf@Closing Price\&quot;,\&quot;indexProperties\&quot;:[\&quot;xxxxxx 20260122\&quot;,\&quot;xxxxxx 20260122\&quot;],\&quot;indexPropertiesMap\&quot;:{\&quot;xxxxxx\&quot;:\&quot;20260122\&quot;,\&quot;xxxxxx\&quot;:\&quot;20260122\&quot;},\&quot;domain\&quot;:\&quot;abs_xxxxetfxx\&quot;,\&quot;relatedSize\&quot;:0}]&quot;,&quot;dataSize&quot;:1,&quot;datas&quot;:[{&quot;code&quot;:&quot;GLD&quot;,&quot;Ticker&quot;:&quot;GLD.P&quot;,&quot;market_code&quot;:&quot;169&quot;,&quot;Closing Price&quot;:&quot;451.79&quot;,&quot;Date&quot;:&quot;20260122&quot;,&quot;Name&quot;:&quot;SPDR Gold Shares&quot;}],&quot;meta&quot;:{&quot;extra&quot;:{}},&quot;row_count&quot;:1,&quot;status_code&quot;:0,&quot;status_msg&quot;:&quot;ok&quot;},&quot;category&quot;:&quot;generic&quot;,&quot;chart_type&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;show_type&quot;:&quot;jgyKline3&quot;,&quot;title_config&quot;:{&quot;config&quot;:{&quot;display&quot;:true,&quot;display2&quot;:false,&quot;txt_style&quot;:0,&quot;url&quot;:&quot;&quot;},&quot;data&quot;:{&quot;h1&quot;:&quot;GLD Trend&quot;,&quot;h2&quot;:&quot;&quot;},&quot;show_type&quot;:&quot;title1&quot;},&quot;support_refresh&quot;:false,&quot;data_config&quot;:{&quot;data_ext_params&quot;:{},&quot;query_type&quot;:&quot;intusetf&quot;}}],&quot;global&quot;:{&quot;query_type&quot;:&quot;intusetf&quot;},&quot;page&quot;:{&quot;language&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;layout&quot;:{&quot;layout_data&quot;:&quot;[{\&quot;showType\&quot;:\&quot;jgyKline3\&quot;,\&quot;uuid\&quot;:\&quot;5db05d87c9c881eb\&quot;}]&quot;},&quot;render_for&quot;:&quot;aigc&quot;},&quot;query_condition&quot;:{},&quot;data_config&quot;:{&quot;data_ext_params&quot;:{},&quot;query_type&quot;:&quot;intusetf&quot;}}' dataurl='undefined'></visualization> <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-22/gold-climbs-to-record-as-weaker-dollar-extends-scorching-rally?embedded-checkout=true" target='__blank'>Gold prices surged to a historic high near $5,000 per ounce in early Asian trading on Friday, January 23</a> , fueled by a confluence of a weakening US dollar and escalating concerns regarding the political independence of the Federal Reserve. Spot gold climbed 0.5% to $4,959.39 an ounce, extending a frantic rally that has seen the metal gain 15% in just the first few weeks of 2026, following its best annual performance since 1979. The catalyst for this latest leg up is US President Donald Trump’s renewed verbal attacks on the central bank, which have rattled bond markets and sent the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index down 0.8% for the week. As investors rotate capital out of fiat currencies and sovereign bonds, the market is pricing in a &quot;debasement trade&quot;—a defensive maneuver against potential monetary instability. While the momentum is undeniable, the speed of the ascent suggests heightened volatility ahead as the market awaits clarity on the next Fed Chair.<h2>The Perfect Storm: Why the Rally is Sustainable</h2>The current rally is not merely a speculative bubble; it is underpinned by structural shifts in the global macroeconomic landscape that have intensified throughout January. The primary driver is the erosion of confidence in the US dollar as a store of value, exacerbated by the executive branch&#39;s pressure on monetary policy. When the independence of a central bank is questioned, the risk premium on that nation&#39;s currency invariably rises.We are witnessing a clear negative correlation between the dollar and bullion. As the greenback weakens, gold becomes cheaper for holders of other currencies, spurring global demand. However, the geopolitical dimension provides a floor for these prices. Beyond the domestic monetary policy drama, the &quot;Greenland crisis&quot; has emerged as a significant flashpoint, adding to existing instability involving Venezuela and Iran. These geopolitical risks have reduced the appeal of traditional safe havens like US Treasuries, channeling liquidity directly into the precious metals complex.Furthermore, the &quot;fear of missing out&quot; (FOMO) among institutional investors is palpable. Unlike previous rallies driven by retail speculation, data indicates substantial accumulation by central banks and private wealth funds. This institutional sponsorship suggests that the $5,000 level is viewed not as a ceiling, but as a psychological pivot point for further upside. The silver market confirms this broad-based sentiment, with silver jumping 0.7% to a record $96.91, signaling that this is a sector-wide revaluation rather than an isolated gold event.<h2>Historical Parallels: The 1979 Analog</h2>From a technical and historical perspective, the current market dynamics bear a striking resemblance to the late 1970s. In 1979, gold experienced a parabolic run driven by stagflation fears, an energy crisis, and a crisis of confidence in the US dollar. Today, while inflation dynamics differ, the crisis of confidence is remarkably similar.Technical indicators suggest the market is in overbought territory, but in strong secular bull markets, assets can remain overbought for extended periods. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the weekly chart is elevated, yet volume remains high, indicating legitimate accumulation rather than exhaustion.Historically, when gold breaks a multi-decade inflation-adjusted high, it tends to enter a price discovery phase where resistance levels are nonexistent. The move from $4,000 to nearly $5,000 happened faster than previous $1,000 increments, a phenomenon known as &quot;acceleration.&quot; If we apply the Fibonacci extension levels from the last major consolidation phase in late 2025, a technical projection places the next major resistance not at $5,000, but closer to $5,250. However, investors should be wary of sharp, short-term pullbacks. In similar setups historically, a 5% to 8% correction often occurs to flush out leveraged leverage positions before the trend resumes.<h2>Wall Street’s Verdict: The Street Chases the Price</h2>Major investment banks are rapidly adjusting their forecasts to catch up with the market&#39;s reality. The most notable revision comes from Goldman Sachs Group Inc., which has historically been an accurate barometer for commodity super-cycles.Goldman Sachs has lifted its year-end gold price forecast to $5,400 an ounce, up significantly from their previous estimate of $4,900. In a note to clients, analysts Daan Struyven and Lina Thomas emphasized that risks are &quot;significantly skewed to the upside.&quot; Their rationale hinges on intensifying demand from private-sector investors who are diversifying further due to &quot;lingering global policy uncertainty&quot;.This bullish stance is echoed across the street, though with varying degrees of aggression. Analysts at Morgan Stanley have previously noted that real yields—the return on bonds after inflation—are the key driver for gold. With the President pressuring the Fed for more interest rate cuts, and a potential dovish Fed Chair appointee on the horizon, real yields are likely to remain suppressed or negative. This environment is the ideal &quot;Goldilocks&quot; scenario for non-yielding assets like gold. Conversely, Bank of America has maintained a constructive view, focusing on the central bank accumulation trend, noting that de-dollarization efforts by emerging markets continue to provide a structural bid for physical gold.<img data-json="{&quot;id&quot;:&quot;8b319fd2-39cf-492c-a206-58327d8fa949&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}],&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/088dbb27-6082-4d61-b6df-f7d361ebf388_Gold Hits $5,000 Is Goldman’s $5,400 Target Viable or Is a Correction Imminent_e865f9e31769137970769.png&quot;}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/088dbb27-6082-4d61-b6df-f7d361ebf388_Gold Hits $5,000 Is Goldman’s $5,400 Target Viable or Is a Correction Imminent_e865f9e31769137970769.png" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" /><h2></h2><h2>The Bearish Case: Why a Reversal to $4,000 Is Possible</h2>While the consensus is euphoric, prudent investors must examine the growing risks of a severe correction. Not all analysts agree with the parabolic trajectory to $5,400; in fact, several authoritative voices are flashing warning signals that the trade is overcrowded and priced for perfection.Robin Bhar, founder of Robin Bhar Metals Consulting, offers a starkly contrarian view, forecasting that gold prices could average closer to $4,000 this year, with potential support levels tested as low as $3,500. The bearish argument here is grounded in &quot;demand destruction&quot;: at $5,000/oz, physical jewelry demand in price-sensitive markets like India and China may collapse, removing a critical floor for the market. Indeed, domestic prices in India have already seen corrections due to profit-booking, signaling that physical buyers are balking at these record levels.Furthermore, analysts at Wells Fargo maintain a more conservative forecast range of $4,500 to $4,700, implying a roughly 10% downside from current levels rather than further gains. The key risk catalyst is the Federal Reserve. As noted by IG International, if the Fed proves unexpectedly hawkish—or if tariffs reignite inflation that forces interest rates higher rather than lower—real yields could spike. Historically, a sharp rise in real yields has been the most reliable &quot;cooler&quot; for gold rallies. With technical indicators screaming &quot;overbought&quot; and the &quot;margin for disappointment&quot; growing, a resolution of geopolitical tensions or a Supreme Court ruling limiting tariffs could rapidly unwind the risk premium, triggering a violent mean reversion toward the $4,000-$4,500 range.ConclusionThe test of $5,000 marks a definitive inflection point for the precious metals complex. While the momentum behind the &quot;debasement trade&quot; provides strong support for Goldman’s $5,400 trajectory, the growing divergence between financial speculation and physical demand destruction creates a fragile foundation. The market is now effectively caught between a political tailwind—uncertainty over the Fed—and a fundamental headwind—buyers striking at record prices. Consequently, the &quot;easy money&quot; phase of the rally appears to be over. For US market participants, the prudent strategy is no longer aggressive accumulation of spot gold, but rather a strategic rotation into high-margin miners or utilizing options to hedge against a potential mean reversion to the $4,500 levels. The secular bull market remains intact, but at these altitudes, volatility is the only guarantee.

us_middle_importance

Stock

Bond

Europe

NorthAmerica

WallStreetBets

Hedge Fund

Asset Management

Goldman Sachs

Gold Hits $5,000: Is Goldman’s $5,400 Target Viable or Is a Correction Imminent?

<video src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HZI2nC2fNlI" poster="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode22Rule_eeda63611769114861817.jpeg" data="{&quot;videoUrl&quot;:&quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/HZI2nC2fNlI&quot;,&quot;coverUrl&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode22Rule_eeda63611769114861817.jpeg&quot;}"></video>OpenAI is back in the market for another <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-21/anthropic-s-revenue-run-rate-tops-9-billion-as-vcs-pile-in" target='__blank'>massive funding round</a> — and it may be the single most important “stress test” for the AI trade heading into 2026, because it sits right at the intersection of two investor fears that haven’t gone away: the cost of the data-center arms race, and whether real end demand will ultimately justify the trillions being deployed.Less than a month after SoftBank completed a $40 billion investment in OpenAI at a roughly $300 billion valuation, reports now suggest CEO Sam Altman is pursuing an additional multibillion-dollar raise — potentially totaling $50 billion or more — with discussions that could imply a valuation in the $750 billion to $830 billion range. If that number holds, it would represent one of the fastest and most dramatic private-market re-ratings in modern tech history, and it would force investors to confront a blunt question: is OpenAI being valued like a high-growth software platform, or like an infrastructure utility that happens to produce intelligence?That distinction matters because the AI market is no longer just about models and chatbots — it’s about physical buildout. The defining feature of the next phase is power, GPUs, and data-center capacity. And OpenAI is widely viewed as the lynchpin. It’s not simply a category leader in consumer AI; it’s also one of the strongest catalysts behind the “picks-and-shovels” spending cycle across Nvidia’s GPUs, cloud capacity from hyperscalers, and the supplier ecosystem building cooling, networking, and power infrastructure. That’s why OpenAI’s ability to raise capital isn’t just an OpenAI story — it’s an AI market story.The reason this is such a live wire topic is the broader concern: the data-center buildout can absolutely keep running — until it can’t. If capital markets tighten, if sovereign wealth funds stop writing checks, or if the narrative shifts toward “overbuild,” then the spending cycle can slow fast, especially because AI hardware and data center assets depreciate quickly and need constant reinvestment. In other words, this is not a one-time capex wave — it’s a treadmill. And OpenAI’s funding efforts are basically the treadmill’s heart-rate monitor.Even in a bullish demand environment, the math is intimidating. OpenAI is reportedly generating around $20 billion in annualized revenue for 2025, up sharply from roughly $6 billion in 2024, but it is still not profitable and is burning cash at a massive pace. Some estimates circulating in the market suggest OpenAI’s annual cash burn could be on the order of $17 billion, with infrastructure commitments measured in the hundreds of billions — or even longer-dated figures approaching the trillion-dollar range over many years. Whether every number is directionally perfect or not, the message is the same: this is a business scaling revenue quickly, but also scaling costs almost as quickly, because compute is the primary input.That’s where the fundraising strategy becomes so central. The reported outreach to Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds — including conversations in the UAE — isn’t random. Sovereign pools are among the few sources of capital that can underwrite $10–$20 billion checks without demanding near-term profitability, and that’s what you need when the mission is to lock in compute, power, and capacity at global scale. OpenAI has already had links to the region through MGX, and the next round would deepen that relationship at a dramatically higher valuation.OpenAI’s timing also matters: a round expected to close by the end of Q1 would become an early “signal flare” for the AI financing environment in 2026. If it clears at the rumored size and valuation, it tells the market that the capital still exists to keep the buildout moving. If it struggles or comes in smaller, the market will interpret it as friction — and the first crack in the “infinite funding for infinite capex” narrative.Anthropic’s numbers help frame the other side of this story: demand is real, and monetization is accelerating, even if the cost structure remains brutal. According to reporting cited in your notes, <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/openai-nears-50-billion-funding-131708081.html" target='__blank'>Anthropic&#39;s revenue run rate</a> has more than doubled since last summer — from roughly $4 billion in July of last year to over $9 billion by the end of 2025. That’s an eye-popping acceleration, and it’s exactly the type of datapoint investors want to see if they’re going to keep funding the infrastructure wave.Anthropic is also reportedly lining up a round that could surpass $20 billion in total size when combining new investment firm participation with prior strategic commitments — with Coatue and GIC each potentially putting in around $1.5 billion, and Iconiq expected to invest $1 billion or more. The round is described as oversubscribed, with the company initially targeting $10 billion from investment firms alone. That checks two important boxes for the broader AI tape: there’s still massive investor appetite for scaled AI platforms, and there’s evidence that the “demand flywheel” isn’t purely theoretical.At the same time, Anthropic introduces one of the most sensitive issues in the AI ecosystem: circular funding relationships. When the suppliers of compute (cloud providers and GPU platforms) are also the investors in the AI developers — and those developers are also customers of those suppliers — the lines get blurry. Some investors see this as smart ecosystem-building. Others see it as financial engineering: capital comes in, gets spent on compute, and flows back to the same incumbents. That dynamic doesn’t invalidate the business, but it can absolutely change how public market investors think about sustainability, independence, and long-term margins.The competitive backdrop also shapes why OpenAI remains the “prime mover” of AI capex. The category has expanded and matured — Google, Anthropic, xAI, and others are all credible — but OpenAI remains the focal point for enterprise adoption, vendor partnerships, and the broader buildout narrative. If OpenAI is the company pushing the most aggressive agenda on infrastructure, then its funding success becomes the closest thing the market has to a single data point answering: “Are we still building, or are we pausing?”That brings up the IPO question — and why it’s likely to be a constant 2026 drumbeat even if nothing formally happens. An OpenAI IPO would be one of the biggest events in tech markets in decades, but it’s complicated by structure, governance, and the simple reality that public market investors will demand cleaner profitability pathways and clearer unit economics than private markets do. That said, if OpenAI continues to stack mega-rounds at ever-higher valuations, it actually increases IPO pressure over time — because liquidity expectations rise with every step-up.Anthropic feels more “IPO-plausible” on a business fundamentals storyline because it’s increasingly being framed around revenue momentum, enterprise utility, and a path to breakeven later in the decade. But the scale of the capex burden across the whole industry means neither company is likely to rush toward public markets unless the IPO becomes strategically necessary — either to fund expansion, provide liquidity, or validate the model in a moment where private funding becomes less abundant.The bigger takeaway is this: 2026 is shaping up to be the year AI investors stop debating the quality of the models and start debating the durability of the financing. OpenAI is the lynchpin because it is both the demand engine and the spending engine. If it can raise another $50 billion at a near-trillion-dollar valuation, the data-center buildout story stays alive and loud. If it can’t, the market won’t just question OpenAI — it will question how many of these trillion-dollar infrastructure ambitions can exist at the same time, before the ROI math finally demands a reality check.

Middle-East

Semiconductor

US Tech

Artificial Intelligence

Nvidia

OpenAI’s $800B Cash Grab Could Decide If the AI Data Center Boom Lives—or Dies in 2026

The semiconductor industry is entering a pivotal inflection point, driven by the insatiable demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) from AI accelerators. As generative AI and large language models (LLMs) redefine computational requirements, HBM has emerged as the linchpin of next-generation hardware. For investors, the question is no longer whether HBM will matter-it does-but rather who will dominate the supply chain. SK Hynix, with its 62% share of the HBM market in Q2 2025, appears poised to lead this golden era, but the race is far from over. <h3>SK Hynix: The HBM Kingmaker</h3>SK Hynix's dominance in HBM is not accidental. The company has invested aggressively in R&amp;D and manufacturing infrastructure, securing a commanding lead over rivals like Samsung and Micron. <a href="https://www.astutegroup.com/news/general/sk-hynix-holds-62-of-hbm-micron-overtakes-samsung-2026-battle-pivots-to-hbm4/">According to Astute Group</a>, SK Hynix's HBM4 development-featuring 10 Gbps data rates and 40% improved power efficiency-has already been integrated into NVIDIA's Rubin GPU platform, a critical milestone for AI-driven workloads. This partnership underscores SK Hynix's strategic alignment with the most influential players in AI hardware. The company's capital expenditure strategy further reinforces its position. In 2025, SK Hynix allocated 2 trillion Korean won to HBM production, <a href="https://globalsemiresearch.substack.com/p/2026-memory-industry-insights">a figure set to rise</a> to 2.5 trillion won in 2026 as demand surges. This investment includes the Union Fab facility in South Korea, scheduled to begin operations in Q1 2027, which will significantly expand its HBM4 output. <img src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/aigc/hxcmp/images/compress-qwen_generated_1769147629893.jpg.png" style="max-width:100%;"/> Such forward-looking infrastructure planning positions SK Hynix to meet the exponential growth in AI workloads, particularly as data centers and cloud providers scramble to upgrade their hardware. <h3>The HBM4 Arms Race: Micron and Samsung's Counterplay</h3>While SK Hynix leads today, the HBM4 race is intensifying. Micron, which overtook Samsung in Q2 2025 with a 21% market share, <a href="https://www.astutegroup.com/news/general/sk-hynix-holds-62-of-hbm-micron-overtakes-samsung-2026-battle-pivots-to-hbm4/">has already begun shipping HBM4 samples</a> rated at 11 Gbps-surpassing SK Hynix's 10 Gbps benchmark. This technical edge, combined with Micron's aggressive production planning (its 2026 capacity is expected to sell out), signals a potential threat to SK Hynix's dominance. Samsung, meanwhile, is playing a longer game. With a 17% HBM market share in Q2 2025, the company <a href="https://www.astutegroup.com/news/general/sk-hynix-holds-62-of-hbm-micron-overtakes-samsung-2026-battle-pivots-to-hbm4/">is focused on qualifying its HBM3E parts</a> for major customers and scaling HBM4 production by 2026. Samsung's P5 facility, slated for 2028, will further bolster its capacity, but its slower timeline leaves room for SK Hynix and Micron to consolidate early market share. The competitive dynamics highlight a critical trend: HBM is no longer a niche product. <a href="https://introl.com/blog/ai-memory-supercycle-hbm-2026">With SK Hynix, Micron, and Samsung</a> collectively controlling over 90% of global HBM production, the market is highly consolidated, and margins are likely to remain under pressure as rivals vie for scale. <h3>Risks and Oversupply Concerns</h3>Despite the bullish outlook, risks loom. SK Hynix's cautious approach to capital allocation-prioritizing DRAM over HBM- <a href="https://globalsemiresearch.substack.com/p/2026-memory-industry-insights">reflects concerns about potential oversupply</a> in 2027. This caution is warranted: as HBM4 ramps, the industry could face a mismatch between supply and demand, particularly if AI adoption slows or if cloud providers delay upgrades. Moreover, the rapid pace of innovation raises questions about obsolescence. HBM4 is already in development, and HBM5 could follow within 18–24 months. Companies that fail to iterate quickly may find themselves sidelined, even if they dominate today. <h3>Strategic Implications for Investors</h3>For investors, the HBM boom presents both opportunity and complexity. SK Hynix's current leadership, infrastructure investments, and partnerships with AI leaders like NVIDIA make it a compelling long-term play. However, the competitive landscape is fluid. Micron's technical advancements and Samsung's long-term capacity plans could disrupt the status quo. The key differentiator will be execution. Companies that can scale HBM4 production while maintaining cost efficiency will capture the lion's share of profits. Those that overextend-like SK Hynix's rivals in the DRAM market-risk being punished by cyclical downturns. <h3>Conclusion</h3>The AI memory supercycle is here, and HBM is its lifeblood. SK Hynix's strategic positioning-backed by market share, infrastructure, and partnerships-makes it a prime beneficiary of this era. Yet, the semiconductor industry's history is littered with cautionary tales of overconfidence. For investors, the golden era of HBM will be defined not just by who wins today, but by who adapts fastest to tomorrow's demands.

Asia-Pacific

Loom Network

Cloud

AIGC

Micron Technology

The AI Memory Supply Shortage: A Golden Era for SK Hynix and Semiconductor Investors?

<video src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HZI2nC2fNlI" poster="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode22Rule_b3020d4f1769089675174.jpeg" data="{&quot;videoUrl&quot;:&quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/HZI2nC2fNlI&quot;,&quot;coverUrl&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode22Rule_b3020d4f1769089675174.jpeg&quot;}"></video> <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1740604/000162828025042203/bitgoholdingsincforms-1.htm" target='__blank'>BitGo</a> is stepping onto the public stage today as one of the first crypto-focused IPOs of 2026, offering investors a rarer kind of digital-asset exposure: the plumbing, not the speculation. Rather than living and dying on retail trading volumes like many crypto-linked equities, BitGo’s pitch is built around custody, staking, settlement, and institutional-grade infrastructure — the services that have to function whether bitcoin is ripping higher or sulking in a drawdown. That framing matters this morning because bitcoin has been sliding, risk appetite has been choppy, and the market’s “risk-on/risk-off” thermostat has been unusually sensitive to headlines ranging from Washington’s crypto policy debate to geopolitics.On the <a href="https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/01/21/bitgo-prices-ipo-at-usd18-pitching-custody-growth-over-crypto-trading-swings" target='__blank'>deal itself</a> , BitGo priced its IPO at $18 per share, above the marketed $15–$17 range, raising about $212.8 million and implying an equity value around $2.0–$2.1 billion at pricing. The offering size was 11,821,595 shares of Class A common stock, with the company selling 11,026,365 shares and selling shareholders offering 795,230 shares (meaning BitGo does not receive proceeds from that secondary portion). Underwriters also have a 30-day option to purchase up to 1.77 million additional shares. The IPO is being led by Goldman Sachs as lead book-runner with Citigroup as a book-running manager, alongside a deep bench that includes Deutsche Bank, Mizuho, Wells Fargo Securities, Keefe Bruyette &amp; Woods, Canaccord Genuity, and Cantor, with additional co-managers listed as well. The shares are set to begin trading today under ticker BTGO. <a href="https://www.iposcoop.com/the-ipo-buzz-bitgo-holdings-btgo-prices-ipo-at-18-1-above-range/" target='__blank'>What does BitGo actually do</a> ? At its core, BitGo is a crypto infrastructure platform focused on secure storage and movement of digital assets for institutions — think asset managers, exchanges, corporates, and high net-worth clients who need custody, wallet infrastructure, compliance tooling, settlement rails, and staking capabilities. If crypto is a casino, BitGo sells the vaults, the cameras, and the armored trucks. The company has also been expanding its institutional capabilities, including pushing further into OTC and derivatives workflows where clients can execute more complex strategies while keeping collateral in regulated custody — a structure aimed at reducing counterparty and operational risk relative to the “send it to a trading venue and hope” approach that has repeatedly blown up across crypto cycles.The key operating metric BitGo highlights is Assets on Platform (AoP), which it defines as the median of daily balances of assets held on the platform over a measured period — an attempt to dampen the distortion from day-to-day token price swings. AoP growth is essentially BitGo’s equivalent of “AUM,” and it drives monetization opportunities across custody, staking, trading, and services. BitGo also tracks the number of clients, number of users, and assets staked, all of which have expanded sharply through the cycle — with AoP rising from roughly $17.0B to $30.8B to $90.3B across recent year-end periods cited in its disclosures, and client counts increasing meaningfully as institutional participation broadened.The financials, however, need a warning label because they can look bizarre at first glance. BitGo reports very large “total revenue” figures largely because certain digital-asset trading and staking activities are recognized on a gross basis for accounting purposes, which inflates revenue alongside similarly large associated costs. In other words, headline revenue can be huge even when the “economic take rate” is far smaller. Still, BitGo has shown profitability: it reported net income for 2024 and for the first three quarters of 2025, and in the 12 months ended Sept. 30, 2025 it reported net income of about $164.7 million on reported revenue of $11.1 billion, alongside AoP of about $104 billion at that date. Preliminary unaudited estimates for full-year 2025 suggested thin operating profit on much larger reported revenue, underscoring how sensitive reported lines can be to mix, prices, and trading activity.So what should investors worry about? First, cyclicality: BitGo explicitly warns that results fluctuate with digital asset prices, volatility, and sentiment — when markets are up, AoP rises and client activity improves; when markets are down, activity cools, AoP falls, and revenue pressure follows. Second, the “gross vs net” accounting dynamic can make quarters look like a roller coaster and can confuse generalist investors, which matters a lot for a newly public stock trying to build trust. Third, concentration and product dependence risk: if demand shifts toward assets or protocols BitGo doesn’t support, or if regulation limits what can be offered in certain jurisdictions, growth can slow. Fourth, regulatory and reputational risk is ever-present in custody and infrastructure — when things go wrong in crypto, the market tends to punish the whole neighborhood before it reads the street signs.The macro backdrop is unusually important today because BitGo is effectively an institutional “risk appetite proxy” even if its business model is less trading-heavy than some peers. Bitcoin has been under pressure, and crypto equities have had a rough stretch, with multiple listed names drawing down hard in recent months as the sector’s valuation multiple de-rated. Meanwhile, U.S. policy uncertainty remains a live variable, with investors watching how Washington’s regulatory framework evolves for stablecoins, market structure, and broader oversight — all of which can directly affect institutional engagement. Layer on general risk sentiment — rates expectations, dollar moves, and the tape’s willingness to own higher-beta exposures — and BitGo’s first day becomes as much a “market mood test” as it is a company-specific event.That’s why BitGo is worth watching today even for investors who don’t plan to touch the stock. A strong debut would suggest public markets are willing to fund crypto infrastructure again — potentially re-opening an IPO window for the next cohort of digital-asset firms and improving sentiment across the complex. A weak debut, especially if it breaks issue quickly, would reinforce that public investors still demand a steep discount for anything crypto-adjacent, which could keep the sector in a risk-off penalty box and discourage other issuers. In short, BTGO’s first print is less about a one-day pop and more about whether the market is ready to treat “crypto picks-and-shovels” as a real asset class — or whether it’s still trading the whole space like a meme with a balance sheet.

us_low_importance

personal_finance

Alternative Investments

crypto

Digital Assets

Technical Breakouts

Cryptocurrency Exposure

Investing

Top Gainers

Short-Term Movers

Movers

Bitcoin

Cryptocurrencies

Blockchain Economy

BitGo Holdings

BitGo Goes Public Today — Is BTGO the IPO That Tells You If Crypto Is Back… or Breaking?

<video src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HZI2nC2fNlI" poster="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode22Rule_b55158241769109911226.jpeg" data="{&quot;videoUrl&quot;:&quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/HZI2nC2fNlI&quot;,&quot;coverUrl&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode22Rule_b55158241769109911226.jpeg&quot;}"></video>Intel <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/intel-earnings-set-to-test-stock-rally-as-wall-street-grows-bullish-on-chipmakers-ai-position-143443999.html" target='__blank'>reports</a> after the close tonight, and the setup is about as clean as it gets: the stock has been ripping, the narrative has shifted from “can they survive?” to “can they execute flawlessly?”, and the valuation is now doing the thing that valuations do when investors get religion. Shares broke out above $48 yesterday and pushed to a four-year high, which effectively turns this earnings print into a referendum on whether the turnaround story deserves a new multiple—or whether the market got ahead of itself and needs to re-test that breakout level as support.The <a href="https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-earnings-stock-price-9b0b6002?gaa_at=eafs&amp;gaa_n=AWEtsqfyt2LLbZw6TkVStm0WzQuX4r6HMLX4OkuiKCAC97BQhYE58nSm2nFzq7hgtbQ%3D&amp;gaa_ts=69727987&amp;gaa_sig=CXPEgHJLZqHGc6de628DLpmxzbPpsyvN5zu9TDkS8r4wgNh2BKzq-oUQi6jq-b3DuIx5rRXWUbgkN3wTeeiuRw%3D%3D" target='__blank'>overarching</a> is a tug-of-war between improving demand in Intel’s core CPU franchises and the long, expensive climb back to manufacturing credibility. Bulls are leaning into three ideas: (1) traditional server CPU demand is tightening as AI workloads pull through broader data-center buildouts; (2) Intel’s PC roadmap (Panther Lake) is arriving at a moment when OEMs and enterprises actually want a refresh cycle; and (3) the foundry narrative—18A today, 14A later—can re-rate Intel from a cyclical product company into a strategic U.S.-based manufacturing platform. Bears aren’t arguing those themes are imaginary; they’re arguing Intel’s current product competitiveness and margin structure don’t justify the speed (and size) of the re-rating.That valuation tension is visible when you stack Intel against peers. On earnings multiples, Intel screens “expensive/awkward” because the earnings base is still impaired: the forward non-GAAP P/E is roughly 159x , compared with ~39x for Nvidia, ~25x for TSMC, and ~32x for Broadcom (AMD is also rich at ~63x FY1). On trailing results it’s even messier: Intel’s non-GAAP TTM is effectively not meaningful and GAAP TTM is around 1,205x—basically telling you the market is paying for a future earnings recovery that hasn’t shown up cleanly yet. On sales multiples, though, Intel looks cheaper: ~4.5x price-to-sales and ~5.5x EV/sales, far below Nvidia and Broadcom (~24x-ish) and below AMD/TSM (~11–13x). That’s why the stock can look “value-like” to one investor and “bubble-ish” to another depending on which denominator they trust. The real debate is whether the earnings denominator starts catching up.For the quarter itself, expectations are modest and that matters because the stock isn’t trading like expectations are modest. Street numbers clustered around adjusted EPS of about $0.08–$0.09 on revenue around $13.4B for Q4, down versus the year-ago period. That’s the baseline. What investors will actually trade is guidance, margins, and any evidence Intel is converting demand into sustainable profitability rather than simply operating in a constrained supply environment. Morgan Stanley’s framing is a good representation of the skeptical camp: they acknowledge CPU shortages can support the turnaround, and they’ve seen server tightness for months, but they question whether the longer-term earnings power supports the re-rating. They also argue that a meaningful chunk of incremental server demand may be flowing to AMD, which puts a ceiling on how much Intel can “win” even in a rising tide.The first “tell” in the print is going to be the product segments and what they imply about share. Investors will look for signals that demand is strong in both Client and Data Center, but also whether Intel is under-shipping demand due to capacity constraints—and if so, whether that’s actually translating to pricing power or just pushing customers to alternative supply. Commentary around Granite Rapids upgrades, backlog, and supply visibility into 2026 will be key. If management describes the server market as effectively sold-out but can’t show meaningful operating leverage, the market will start asking uncomfortable questions about mix, yields, and competitiveness.The second “tell” is gross margin, because margin is where narratives either become businesses or remain PowerPoint. There’s already a widely-circulated view that gross margins are under pressure due to mix, early ramps, and the cost of building out leading-edge manufacturing. If Intel prints or guides to margins that look stubbornly low despite demand strength, it reinforces the bear case that this is a supply-constrained, cost-heavy recovery—especially if AMD continues to capture the bulk of the incremental server growth.Capex is the third—and maybe most important—swing factor. For Intel, capex isn’t just a spending line; it’s the credibility line. Foundry progress requires enormous, sustained investment in tools, process development, and capacity, and management has repeatedly framed capex discipline as essential to protecting liquidity. Investors will want a clear capex number/trajectory and a rationale that ties spending to (a) committed demand, (b) yield improvements, and (c) the cadence of 18A ramp plus the longer-dated 14A push. If capex comes in higher, the market will ask whether Intel is chasing TSMC’s scale without TSMC’s customer pull-through; if capex comes in lower, the market will ask if Intel is under-investing just as the AI-driven manufacturing arms race accelerates. Either way, capex is the fulcrum because it determines whether “foundry optionality” is a real call option or just an expensive hobby.That brings us to Intel Foundry Services (IFS), which is doing heavy lifting in the stock even though it’s still a financial drag. Investors want two things here: proof that 18A is real (performance, yields, schedule) and evidence of external customer momentum (even small volume wins, packaging deals, qualification milestones). The bullish camp, reflected in Seaport’s upgrade, is leaning on strong signals from PC OEMs/ODMs for Panther Lake and the idea that the commercial launch of 18A marks Intel’s return to a credible process-improvement path. They also make a practical point: even if 18A alone won’t “save” IFS, Intel can get traction via advanced packaging while TSMC’s CoWoS capacity is constrained. That’s an underappreciated wedge—packaging wins can be a beachhead.The skeptical camp is essentially saying: it’s hard to sell yourself as the manufacturing alternative when your own products are struggling to fully capitalize on demand. Morgan Stanley’s note captures that: foundry narratives may be bolstering the stock, but customers evaluating Intel Foundry will notice if Intel can’t meet demand in its own product lines or if product competitiveness lags for multiple years. That’s why the market keeps circling back to the same catalysts: Panther Lake reception, 18A validation, and any “real partner” announcements versus rumor mill chatter (Apple is the obvious name everyone whispers).The political overlay has also become part of the story, and it’s not subtle. President Trump’s January 8 post poured gasoline on the “strategic national asset” framing, writing: “I just finished a great meeting with the very successful Intel CEO, Lip-Bu Tan… Intel just launched the first SUB 2 NANOMETER CPU PROCESSOR designed, built, and packaged right here in the U.S.A… Our Country is determined to bring leading edge Chip Manufacturing back to America, and that is exactly what is happening!!!” In market terms, that kind of endorsement reinforces the perception of policy tailwinds and potentially supportive capital, which can matter a lot when you’re funding a multi-year manufacturing rebuild.So what happens if results falter? Technically, the breakout above $48 now matters. If the company disappoints on guide, margins, or credibility markers (capex clarity, foundry milestones, customer traction), a pullback that “tests the breakout” is the cleanest market response. A dip toward $48 would effectively ask: was that move real accumulation ahead of fundamentals, or a narrative squeeze that needs to reset? Conversely, if Intel delivers even a modest beat/raise with improving margin commentary, clearer capex discipline, and incremental foundry proof points, the market can justify staying long the re-rate—even if near-term EPS still looks unimpressive.Tonight’s report is less about whether Intel prints $0.08 or $0.09, and more about whether management can connect the dots between demand, execution, and a credible path to earnings power. The stock is priced like those dots are already connected. Now Intel has to show its work.

Chip Stocks

Intel

Intel’s Make-or-Break Earnings: After a 4-Year Breakout, Is $48 the Trapdoor?

Trump's first year was an economic bummer

Kremlin: US has less than $5B of frozen Russian assets

Why Rick Rule Is Selling Silver Into the Rally (And What He’s Buying Next)

China plans to launch LNG futures contracts denominated in RMB - Reuters

JPMorgan statement: While we regret President Trump has sued us, we believe the lawsuit is without merit

What, If Anything, Is Behind Trump's Greenland Dream?

India-EU to sign MoU on mobility in some sectors - says EU official

Top Rated Stock: Tired of AI Hype? Check These Alternatives

Trump: I'm not going to pay anything for Greenland

Musk’s Davos Debut: Optimus Robot to Launch by End of 2027

U.S. Revises Up Third-Quarter GDP Growth to 4.4% While Core PCE Remains Under Control

ECB's Lagarde: We shouldn't be talking about the rupture of the world order, it's more about alternatives

India’s holdings of US Treasuries fall to five-year low as nation supports currency and diversifies reserves

India-EU to announce FTA next week: EU official

On-chain Activity Indicates Weakening Whale Long Sentiment, Rising Observer Participation

Affirm Joins Fintechs Seeking Bank Charters Under Trump

World Labs' $5B Valuation Talk: Is This the Main Character in the Spatial AI Boom?

Astera Labs: Valuing the Scalability of Its $20 Billion Market Bet

JOE/Bitcoin Stuck in 6.4e-7 Range as Indecision Reigns

Integrating UNG's Volatility Strategy into a Portfolio: A Risk-Adjusted Approach

Samsung Denies 80% Price Hike: The Tactical Setup for Memory Stocks

ZachXBT: Hacker John Suspected in 2024 US Government $90 Million Theft Case

Smart Money Fleeing HCSG After 66% Rally: Insiders Also Selling Skin

GigaCloud's Big-and-Bulky Model: A Needham Conference Analysis of Growth, Capital Allocation, and Risks

GigaCloud's Big-and-Bulky B2B Play: Assessing TAM, Scalability, and Growth Levers

The Interplay of Japanese 10-Year Bond Yields and Bitcoin Volatility: Implications for 2026

Ainvest Option Flow Daily Digest - 2025-09-19 

Buying Oracle Shares Won't Make You As Rich As Larry Ellison, But Not Doing So Will Surely Leave You With Regret 

Micron’s AI Memory Machine Keeps Humming—But the Tape Wants Even More

UBS Sees Tesla Exceeding 500K Q3 Deliveries, New Record Ahead

Latest

On-chain Activity Indicates Weakening Whale Long Sentiment, Rising Observer Participation

Affirm Joins Fintechs Seeking Bank Charters Under Trump

World Labs' $5B Valuation Talk: Is This the Main Character in the Spatial AI Boom?

Astera Labs: Valuing the Scalability of Its $20 Billion Market Bet

JOE/Bitcoin Stuck in 6.4e-7 Range as Indecision Reigns

Integrating UNG's Volatility Strategy into a Portfolio: A Risk-Adjusted Approach

Samsung Denies 80% Price Hike: The Tactical Setup for Memory Stocks

ZachXBT: Hacker John Suspected in 2024 US Government $90 Million Theft Case

Smart Money Fleeing HCSG After 66% Rally: Insiders Also Selling Skin

GigaCloud's Big-and-Bulky Model: A Needham Conference Analysis of Growth, Capital Allocation, and Risks

GigaCloud's Big-and-Bulky B2B Play: Assessing TAM, Scalability, and Growth Levers

The Interplay of Japanese 10-Year Bond Yields and Bitcoin Volatility: Implications for 2026

US stocks

Trending tickers

Stocks gainers

Stocks losers

Crypto

Trending cryptos

Crypto gainers

Crypto losers