Advanced Charting With AI Automation

Confused by candlesticks? With automatic pattern recognition, AIME scans the chart, draws the lines, and tells you straight: bullish or bearish, while revealing the news behind every move.

Discover our new collection of lightweight essenti

Run the Backtest With AI Precision

Turn past reactions into smarter trades today. AIME digs into years of market data, grouping similar events like earnings calls or FOMC meetings, and calculates the results for you — win rates, max gains, and worst-case drawdowns. Want to test a custom strategy? Just ask Aime!

Newswire

Fast, factual, and for you. Your AI-powered real-time news engine.

Live Stream

Stay on pulse with real-time event coverage. From breaking headlines to live market reactions.

Expert Insights

Gain clear insights and fresh ideas from top analysts through deep, actionable market analysis.

Podcasts

Conversations that think — where markets meet discussion.

Market Dashboard

Your All-in-One Hub for Smarter Investing. Stay ahead with World News, Earnings, Macro Insights, and Portfolio Tracking — all in one place. Soon, get AI-powered recommendations tailored just for you!

TOP stocks with most insiders buying right now

How can Nebius' low-price strategy in Europe challenge CoreWeave's AI supremacy in North America?

If I get my investment "trapped" in certain stock, what should I do?

What is Nvidia's ability in terms of technological innovation?

Stocks with MACD golden cross, MA10>MA50>MA200, RSI<60, price<20

<a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-04/bill-gates-responds-to-alleged-behaviour-in-new-epstein-files/106305816" target='__blank'>Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates publicly addressed explosive allegations contained in recently declassified US Department of Justice files on Wednesday. </a> The documents, part of a massive release of approximately 3 million pages involving the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, include a 2013 draft email accusing Gates of contracting a sexually transmitted disease and attempting to conceal it from his then-wife, Melinda French Gates. Speaking to Nine News on the evening of February 4, Gates dismissed the claims as &quot;false&quot; and the email as a fabrication that was never sent. While this personal scandal is unlikely to impact Microsoft’s operational fundamentals—the stock remains a pillar of the tech sector—it serves as a stark reminder of the long-tail liabilities embedded in the billionaire’s past networking judgments.<img data-json="{&quot;id&quot;:&quot;b1444c29-efc2-4a54-a8c7-f526d5b7e608&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}],&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/b2ec8d64-2356-4c87-9ca1-0ba6e57a578c_DOJ Files Reveal 2013 Epstein &#39;Blackmail&#39; Draft Can Gates’ Reputation Survive New STD Allegations_afff14841770260292992.png&quot;}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/b2ec8d64-2356-4c87-9ca1-0ba6e57a578c_DOJ Files Reveal 2013 Epstein &#39;Blackmail&#39; Draft Can Gates’ Reputation Survive New STD Allegations_afff14841770260292992.png" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" /><h2></h2><h2>The &quot;Blackmail&quot; Dynamic: Deconstructing the 2013 Draft</h2>The core of the recent volatility in public sentiment stems from a specific draft email discovered in the DOJ’s latest tranche of evidence. The correspondence, dated 2013, appears to capture a moment where the relationship between the tech mogul and the financier had deteriorated into hostility. In the draft, which Epstein wrote to himself but allegedly intended for Gates, Epstein expresses dismay that Gates was ending their friendship.More damagingly, the text reveals what legal analysts describe as coercive leverage. Epstein wrote: &quot;TO add insult to injury you them implore me to please delete the emails mails regarding your std, your request that I provide you antibiotics that you can surreptitiously give to Melinda and the description of your penis&quot;. The erratic capitalization and typos in the draft suggest a hastily composed note, yet the intent to leverage personal information is clear.Market observers note that this fits a broader pattern identified in the files, where Epstein sought to &quot;entrap and defame&quot; powerful associates when they attempted to distance themselves. In a separate communication from the same year, Epstein accused Gates of involving him in &quot;morally inappropriate&quot; activities, ranging from facilitating trysts with married women to procuring drugs. These documents portray a transactional relationship that had soured, with Epstein resigning from a role at the Gates Foundation and BG3, a think tank, citing a &quot;severe marital dispute between Melinda and Bill&quot;.<img data-json="{&quot;id&quot;:&quot;be614f20-25ce-450a-842f-0609d08f394e&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}],&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/389e5b05-696f-4650-a768-41413cbe98f3_gates_a6bad7331770260337695.jpg&quot;}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/389e5b05-696f-4650-a768-41413cbe98f3_gates_a6bad7331770260337695.jpg" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" /><h2></h2><h2>The Defense: Gates and the &quot;Regret&quot; Narrative</h2>Facing these renewed allegations, Bill Gates has adopted a strategy of total denial regarding the specific claims, coupled with a broad admission of poor judgment regarding the association itself. In his first public comments since the January 30 document release, Gates stated, &quot;Jeffrey wrote an email to himself, that email was never sent... The email is, you know, false&quot;.Gates’s defense relies heavily on compartmentalization. He insists that his interactions with Epstein were strictly limited to dinners and discussions regarding philanthropic expansion, specifically global health financing. &quot;It&#39;s factually true that I was only at dinners. You know, I never went to the island,&quot; Gates emphasized, attempting to draw a hard line between himself and the illicit activities associated with Epstein’s properties in the U.S. Virgin Islands.However the pressure from his inner circle remains visible. Melinda French Gates, whose divorce from Bill in 2021 was reportedly catalyzed in part by his ties to Epstein, recently expressed &quot;unbelievable sadness&quot; upon learning of the new details. In a podcast interview shortly before Gates’s denial, she shifted the burden of accountability squarely onto her ex-husband, stating, &quot;They need to answer to those things, not me&quot;. This public distancing by French Gates reinforces the narrative that the association was a point of contention long before the public became aware of the depth of the ties.<img data-json="{&quot;id&quot;:&quot;8fa89d43-c891-4f3c-8682-264be2e902a9&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}],&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/a678f87c-a7b5-4268-94a7-1c865846dd39_DOJ Files Reveal 2013 Epstein &#39;Blackmail&#39; Draft Can Gates’ Reputation Survive New STD Allegations_25e27a401770260352002.jpg&quot;}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/a678f87c-a7b5-4268-94a7-1c865846dd39_DOJ Files Reveal 2013 Epstein &#39;Blackmail&#39; Draft Can Gates’ Reputation Survive New STD Allegations_25e27a401770260352002.jpg" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" /><h2>The Philanthropic Trojan Horse: Why They Met</h2>To understand why a figure of Gates&#39;s stature—then the world&#39;s richest man—would engage with a convicted sex offender (Epstein was convicted in 2008, prior to their major meetings in 2011 and beyond), one must look at the mechanics of high-level fundraising.Analysts point out that Epstein effectively marketed himself as a &quot;capital gatekeeper.&quot; He projected the image of a financier who could unlock billions in sovereign wealth and private capital for the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. For Gates, whose primary focus had shifted from Microsoft’s day-to-day operations to eradicating polio and malaria, Epstein represented a potential conduit to untapped resources. The documents suggest that meetings occurred on multiple occasions post-2008 to discuss &quot;expanding philanthropic efforts&quot;.This creates a cautionary tale for institutional investors and corporate boards. The due diligence failure here was not financial, but reputational. Epstein used his proximity to Gates to &quot;launder&quot; his own reputation, gaining renewed social currency in scientific and academic circles (such as the MIT Media Lab) by flaunting his connection to the Microsoft founder. When Gates attempted to sever these ties in 2014, realizing the funding promises were hollow, the &quot;blackmail&quot; phase detailed in the 2013 drafts appears to have begun.

us_low_importance

Stock

NorthAmerica

System software 

Microsoft

DOJ Files Reveal 2013 Epstein 'Blackmail' Draft: Can Gates’ Reputation Survive New STD Allegations?

Recently, automated tools developed by AI unicorns such as Anthropic have triggered a wave of selling, sending global software stocks sharply lower.However, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said the sell-off in software stocks “makes no sense,” adding that time will ultimately prove the market wrong. In his view, AI will rely on existing software tools to accomplish tasks rather than reinventing them from scratch. “Would you use a screwdriver,” he asked, “or invent a new screwdriver every time?”Huang specifically highlighted ServiceNow, SAP, Cadence, and Synopsys, calling them standout companies within the software sector.He added that Nvidia itself has widely adopted a range of software tools, significantly improving employee productivity and allowing teams to focus on the company’s core mission: designing semiconductor chips and the systems that support them.<img data-json="{&quot;id&quot;:&quot;a3de89a7-7e15-4c2b-bc16-588468be6fe0&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}],&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/4561cb0e-10a9-4a13-a864-2b7c2d025be4_a61a-1f67a0a4e91820de5a4e76979a169142_52cb688f1770255822979.jpg&quot;}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/4561cb0e-10a9-4a13-a864-2b7c2d025be4_a61a-1f67a0a4e91820de5a4e76979a169142_52cb688f1770255822979.jpg" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" />Deep Moats Still Protect Software Leaders: System Depth, Licensing, and Networks Are Beyond AIHuang’s argument is not without merit. Leading software companies continue to enjoy deep competitive moats. The first is system depth. Take cloud software leader Salesforce as an example: AI tools may be able to replicate a superficial “shell,” but that accounts for perhaps 2% of Salesforce’s true value. What about the remaining 98%? Who maintains and upgrades the system? Who handles security audits? Who integrates with more than 500 upstream and downstream enterprise tools?The moat of enterprise software lies not in simply “writing the code,” but in long-term expansion, compliance, and maintenance—capabilities Salesforce has built over two decades. Claims that AI agents will rapidly disrupt SaaS do not withstand scrutiny when tested against real-world operations.The legal software sector, which was hit particularly hard in this sell-off, is protected by real-case data and licensing barriers. Thomson Reuters has deep roots in the legal industry through Westlaw, its proprietary database containing over a century of U.S. case law and nearly two billion legal documents. Investors widely view Westlaw as the crown jewel of its legal business—an asset AI simply does not possess.In highly specialized professions such as law, licensing is mandatory, and AI does not hold such credentials. Anthropic itself has cautioned that AI-generated legal analysis must be reviewed by licensed attorneys before being used in legal decisions. Beyond law, industries such as medicine and finance also require professional certification, and AI currently holds no regulatory licenses in any of these fields.<img data-json="{&quot;id&quot;:&quot;77430691-50d2-4e00-9e5d-15aa076824b2&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}],&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/55338729-4bc6-4cf8-983c-3634aaf64a74_0_cq_kqChhB5i_EVaB (1)_91f6eeee1770256153369.jpg&quot;}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/55338729-4bc6-4cf8-983c-3634aaf64a74_0_cq_kqChhB5i_EVaB (1)_91f6eeee1770256153369.jpg" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" />Why AI Won’t Overturn the Gaming Software Industry Anytime SoonGaming software stocks have previously experienced AI-driven sell-offs, but near-term disruption remains unlikely. A Bernstein report notes that generative AI models are fundamentally “probabilistic,” predicting the next pixel or frame based on statistical patterns. Video games, by contrast, must be “deterministic,” governed by strict rules to deliver consistent player experiences.When playing an action game, players demand precise feedback and reliable mechanics—not randomly generated “surprises.” The moat in game development runs far deeper than producing visually appealing 3D assets.The report emphasizes that “fun” is an extraordinarily complex concept. AI-generated visuals alone cannot solve whether a narrative is engaging, combat feels satisfying, or character progression is balanced. In multiplayer games, complexity increases exponentially, encompassing in-game balance, anti-cheat systems, matchmaking, and live-service tuning—factors that generative AI cannot meaningfully understand or replace.Believing that AI can rapidly displace traditional game engines ignores the reality that games are complex, interactive media ecosystems.AI has undoubtedly lowered barriers to entry, resulting in a surge in supply. In 2025, more than 20,000 new games were released on Steam, partly due to AI-assisted development. Yet truly high-quality titles remain scarce: only 137 games received more than 10,000 user reviews.This suggests that AI has increased the supply of low-cost, one-off experiences, but not the supply of distinctive, premium content. Human dopamine responses diminish with repetitive experiences, and flooding the market with homogenized AI-generated content does not lead to sustainable commercial success.<img data-json="{&quot;id&quot;:&quot;3a675a1b-30c4-40a3-a845-1999740f9203&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}],&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/82410e81-b588-4927-8a4e-c1d0e1839fbf_image_fd1e428b1770256054012.png&quot;}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/82410e81-b588-4927-8a4e-c1d0e1839fbf_image_fd1e428b1770256054012.png" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" />Ultimately, IP strength, brand recognition, and emotional attachment remain decisive. Whether Nintendo’s iconic franchises or the Grand Theft Auto series, these long-established emotional connections cannot be replicated overnight by AI.Game companies also possess formidable operational expertise. Bernstein argues that long-term live operations have no “one-size-fits-all” solution. Even similar titles like Battlefield 6 and Arc Raiders can exhibit vastly different player retention outcomes.Sustaining a game’s lifespan requires continuous, context-specific adjustments based on player feedback—dynamic decision-making for which there is currently no evidence AI can outperform elite human teams. If even industry veterans cannot guarantee success, expecting AI to autonomously manage complex online communities is unrealistic.Goldman Sachs echoes this view, noting that commercially viable games must simultaneously satisfy four conditions: repeatable and controllable gameplay logic; long-term balance of progression systems; sustained content updates and live operations; and mature acquisition, retention, and monetization mechanisms. AI currently possesses none of these capabilities.<img data-json="{&quot;id&quot;:&quot;40cdd18d-5880-4c43-8df5-b22efaae3ba9&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}],&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/a2eea037-4c45-4a54-b037-5973bde29374_image_dc7f74361770255934533.png&quot;}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/a2eea037-4c45-4a54-b037-5973bde29374_image_dc7f74361770255934533.png" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" />The Real Risk for Software Stocks: Budget Reallocation, Not AI DisruptionThe true risk facing software stocks is not near-term AI disruption, but customer spending cuts.Consider the data: enterprise AI budgets are growing more than 100% year over year, while overall IT budgets are up only 8%. New customer growth is slowing, and software seat counts are under significant pressure.If AI budgets double while total IT spending grows only modestly, where does the extra funding come from?It doesn’t materialize out of thin air—it is squeezed directly out of SaaS budgets: fewer purchased seats, canceled new application rollouts, and reduced add-on modules.Since 2021, growth rates among publicly traded SaaS companies have declined quarter after quarter. Recent “growth” has largely come from price increases on existing contracts and deeper monetization of current customers—not from net new customer additions.Put plainly, this is not true growth; it is harvesting the existing user base. Without new customers, pricing power eventually hits a ceiling—and churn risk rises.The core question for software companies is whether customers will continue spending on their software, or reallocate budgets toward AI investments. With fixed total budgets, every additional dollar spent on AI is one less dollar for Salesforce seats, Workday modules, or ServiceNow components.Moreover, as AI replaces certain human tasks, enterprises require fewer employees—and therefore fewer software licenses.Earnings season confirms this pressure. Bloomberg data shows that among S&amp;P 500 software companies that have reported results, only 71% exceeded revenue expectations, compared with 85% across the broader technology sector.

us_middle_importance

Europe

Salesforce

Jensen Huang Says: The Software Sell-Off Makes No Sense!

Bitcoin slid below the key $70,000 psychological threshold on Thursday, extending a sharp sell-off that has swept across cryptocurrencies alongside broader risk assets, also marking its weakest level since November 2024, when Donald Trump won the U.S. presidential election after campaigning on a pro-crypto stance.<img data-json="{&quot;id&quot;:&quot;8e261f3e-6971-409e-9430-525880beaf11&quot;,&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}],&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/0ed65306-064b-4087-bd4a-648b9d6dfc14_123_97af2c781770296686455.png&quot;}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/0ed65306-064b-4087-bd4a-648b9d6dfc14_123_97af2c781770296686455.png" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" />Market participants have long viewed $70,000 as a critical support level, and its breach has raised concerns about further downside. Bitcoin was last trading near $69,300 in early U.S. hours, according to CoinMetrics data. Analysts warn that failure to reclaim this level could open the door to a deeper correction toward the $60,000–$65,000 range.The latest downturn has been fueled by a combination of macro, technical, and liquidity-driven pressures. Analysts point to the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve chair as a key catalyst, with expectations growing that a more hawkish policy stance could lead to a shrinking of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet. Cryptocurrencies have historically benefited from abundant liquidity, and the prospect of tighter financial conditions has weighed heavily on speculative assets.Bitcoin&#39;s weakness has also mirrored a broader sell-off in U.S. technology and software stocks this week, underscoring its continued correlation with high-beta risk assets. As equities slid, losses accelerated across digital tokens including ether and XRP, while forced liquidations added further pressure. More than $2 billion worth of long and short crypto positions were liquidated this week alone, according to Coinglass data.The sell-off comes amid a prolonged deterioration in market sentiment. Bitcoin is now roughly 40% below its October peak above $126,000, and other major cryptocurrencies have suffered even steeper declines. Technical indicators have turned increasingly negative, with CryptoQuant noting that bitcoin has broken below its 365-day moving average for the first time since March 2022, a signal historically associated with sustained bearish phases.Institutional participation, once a major pillar of support, is now reversing. Deutsche Bank analysts said the broader decline has been driven largely by sustained outflows from institutional exchange-traded funds. U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs saw more than $3 billion in net outflows in January, following roughly $2 billion in December and $7 billion in November. CryptoQuant separately reported that ETFs, which were net buyers of bitcoin this time last year, have become net sellers in 2026.&quot;This steady selling signals that traditional investors are losing interest, and overall pessimism about crypto is growing,&quot; Deutsche Bank analysts wrote.Against this fragile backdrop, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent moved to shut down speculation that the government might step in to support bitcoin prices. Testifying before Congress on Wednesday, Bessent said the U.S. government will retain bitcoin acquired through asset seizures but has no authority to bail out the cryptocurrency market or direct private banks to buy digital assets during downturns.Asked by California Congressman Brad Sherman whether the Treasury or federal regulators could support bitcoin through bank reserve policy changes, Bessent was unequivocal, stating that neither he nor the Financial Stability Oversight Council has such authority.Bessent also revealed that approximately $500 million worth of seized bitcoin held by the U.S. government has grown to more than $15 billion in value while in custody. However, he emphasized that additional acquisitions for the U.S. strategic bitcoin reserve, established by executive order in March 2025, would only occur through asset forfeitures or budget-neutral strategies, not open-market purchases.While some bitcoin advocates argue that direct government buying could stabilize prices and encourage other nations to follow suit, Bessent&#39;s testimony made clear that no such backstop exists. For investors, that reality reinforces a sobering message as prices slide: bitcoin is trading less on hype and more on liquidity, capital flows, and macro risk, leaving it exposed as global markets continue to de-risk.

Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin

Ethereum

Bitcoin Falls Below the $70,000 Psychological Mark as Broad Sell-Off Deepens, Bessent Dismisses Bailout Speculation

The immediate catalyst was a massive, synchronized withdrawal of capital from institutional channels. On Thursday, <a href="https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/01/30/u-s-listed-bitcoin-ether-etfs-bleed-nearly-usd1-billion-in-one-day">U.S.-listed spot bitcoin and ether ETFs saw nearly $1 billion in outflows in a single session</a>. Bitcoin ETFs alone saw $817.9 million yanked out, their largest daily outflow since November. This coordinated selling from major products like BlackRock's IBIT and Fidelity's FBTC signaled a decisive de-risking by institutions, cutting overall crypto exposure amid rising volatility and hawkish Fed expectations.<img src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/aigc/hxcmp/images/compress-qwen_generated_1770276291727.jpg.png" style="max-width:100%;"/>The outflows triggered a violent price breakdown. As ETF redemptions accelerated, Bitcoin dropped below $85,000 and briefly neared $81,000. This breach of key technical support sparked a cascade of leveraged liquidations, fueling a self-reinforcing sell-off. The move was not isolated; ether also fell more than 7% on the day, showing the liquidity shock was broad-based across the market.<visualization data='{"components":[{"show_type":"jgyNewLowcode","config":{"type":"iwcapp/stockBackTestTool","version":"0.0.3","url":"//cdn.ainvest.com/frontResources/s/foiegras/stockBackTestTool/0.0.3/stockBackTestTool@0.0.3index.js"},"data":{"columns":[{"index_name":"strategy_basic_info","key":"strategy_basic_info","type":"Object"},{"index_name":"backtest_condition","key":"backtest_condition","type":"Object"},{"index_name":"backtest_result","key":"backtest_result","type":"STR"}],"datas":[{"strategy_basic_info":{"name":"ATR Volatility Breakout (Long Only)","description":"Long-only breakout strategy for BTCUSD: Entry when ATR(14) expands above its 60-day average and price closes above the 20-day high. Exit when price closes below the 20-day low, after 10 trading days, or if TP +6% or SL −3% is triggered."},"backtest_condition":{"object":{"display_name":"Object","type":"ticker","ticker":["BTCUSD"]},"open_signal":{"display_name":"Open Signal","type":"criteria","criteria":"ATR(14) &gt; ATR(14) 60-day average AND Close &gt; 20-day high"},"sell_signal":{"display_name":"Close Signal","type":"criteria","criteria":"Close &lt; 20-day low OR max holding 10 days OR TP +6% OR SL −3%"},"risk_control":{"display_name":"Risk Control","parameters":{"take_profit":{"display_name":"Take-Profit","value":6,"unit":"%"},"stop_loss":{"display_name":"Stop-Loss","value":3,"unit":"%"},"max_holding_days":{"display_name":"Hold Days","value":10}}}},"backtest_result":"https://cdn.ainvest.com/backtest/agent/session/784562/1800109709/c40c6996-e294-48da-8a98-b6017c769741/BTCUSD_ATRBreakout_backtest_20240205_20260204.json"}]},"uuid":"1770276396484"}],"page":{"layout":{"layout_mode":"grid","layout_data":"[{\"uuid\": \"1770276396484\", \"show_type\": \"jgyNewLowcode\"}]"}}}'></visualization>The result was a decisive break below critical psychological and technical levels. By Thursday, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/bitcoin-slumps-with-key-70000-level-sight-2026-02-05/">Bitcoin was on the cusp of breaking below the key $70,000 level</a>, falling to $70,052.38, its lowest level since November 2024. The weekly drop of <a href="https://www.cfbenchmarks.com/blog/weekly-index-highlights-february-2-2026">12.1% marks a decisive de-risking</a>, with the entire major crypto set experiencing uniform, steep declines. This wasn't just a correction; it was a liquidity shock that washed out leveraged positions and forced a broad re-pricing of digital asset beta.<h2>The Macro Trigger: Fed Policy and Risk Appetite</h2>The immediate catalyst for the liquidity shock was a broader macro shift. The market's reaction was amplified by the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve Chair, a move perceived as hawkish. Investors fear a shrinking balance sheet under his leadership, which would remove a key source of liquidity that has historically supported speculative assets like crypto. As one analyst noted, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/bitcoin-slumps-with-key-70000-level-sight-2026-02-05/">"A smaller balance sheet is not going to provide any tailwinds for crypto."</a>This policy shift coincided with a surge in economic and political uncertainty, fueling a broad risk-off sentiment. Investors began cutting exposure to all speculative assets, not just crypto. The sell-off was not driven by a single event but by a confluence of pressures: the steady institutional ETF outflows, the hawkish Fed signal, and a fragile market sentiment that had already been cooling for months.The Crypto Fear and Greed Index captures this pivot from greed to fear. While the index itself isn't quantified here, the context is clear: a market that had been in a state of "greed" during the 2024 rally is now shifting into "fear" as prices fall and volatility spikes. This sentiment shift is a direct response to the tightening liquidity environment and the resulting de-risking across asset classes.<h2>The Flow Implications: ETF Redemptions and Beta Re-pricing</h2>The synchronized selling across products is the clearest signal of a structural liquidity drain. On Thursday, <a href="https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/01/30/u-s-listed-bitcoin-ether-etfs-bleed-nearly-usd1-billion-in-one-day">U.S.-listed spot bitcoin and ether ETFs saw nearly $1 billion in outflows in a single session</a>. Bitcoin ETFs alone saw $817.9 million yanked out, their largest daily outflow since November. This wasn't a rotation; it was a broad de-risking, with major products like BlackRock's IBIT and Fidelity's FBTC all shedding hundreds of millions. The pattern shows institutions cutting overall crypto exposure, not just a Bitcoin-specific event.<visualization data='{"components":[{"show_type":"jgyKline3","config":{"codeName":"name","marketTag":"BINANCE","variety":"Crypto","showBottom":true,"moduleList":["RSI"],"maLine":[5,10,20]},"title_config":{"config":{"display":true},"data":{"h1":"Bitcoin (BTCUSD) - K-Line &amp; RSI"}},"data":{"datas":[{"code":"BTCUSD","name":"Bitcoin","market_code":"UDC"}]},"uuid":1770276311062.239}],"page":{"layout":{"layout_mode":"grid","layout_data":"[{"uuid": 1770276311062.239, "show_type": "jgyKline3"}]"}}}'></visualization>The week's performance confirms this was a uniform beta re-pricing. <a href="https://www.cfbenchmarks.com/blog/weekly-index-highlights-february-2-2026">Bitcoin fell -12.1% week-on-week</a>, and the entire major crypto set experienced steep, directional declines. Ether tumbled -20.3%, while Solana, Cardano, and other large caps all fell more than 16%. The clustering of losses beyond -10% for every name suggests the drawdown was driven by positioning and liquidity conditions, not individual asset stories. This uniformity points to a leverage shakeout amid macro pressure, not a fundamental breakdown of any single token.The bottom line is a forced de-risking that has reset the market's trajectory. The massive ETF outflows triggered a violent price breakdown, washing out leveraged positions and forcing a broad re-pricing of digital asset beta. Analysts view this as a leverage shakeout amid macro pressure, with rebound potential if key price supports hold. For now, the fragile ETF demand is tracking price action, creating a feedback loop that will persist until volatility cools and sentiment stabilizes.

Altcoin Analysis

Liquidity Trends

crypto

personal_finance

Alternative Investments

Digital Assets

Top Performing Altcoins

Cryptocurrency Exposure

Bitcoin Price Trends

Investing

Price Volatility

Prices

Daily Movements

Major

Solana

Cardano

BlackRock

Bitcoin's $70k Break: A Liquidity Shock and ETF Outflow Cascade

Alphabet is making a massive, deliberate bet on its future. The company is targeting capital expenditure of <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/google-parent-alphabet-forecasts-sharp-surge-2026-capital-spending-2026-02-04/">$175 billion to $185 billion this year</a>, a move that essentially doubles its projected 2025 spend. This isn't just incremental growth; it's a strategic ramp-up to secure a dominant position in the AI cloud market. The core investment case is straightforward: pour capital into infrastructure now to capture a larger share of a market that is projected to explode from over $400 billion in 2025 to more than $2.3 trillion by 2032.The demand signal is already strong. Google Cloud's revenue grew 48% to $17.7 billion in the fourth quarter, significantly beating analyst estimates. This acceleration demonstrates that Alphabet's AI push is translating into tangible customer adoption and revenue. The company explicitly links its spending to this demand, stating its AI investments and infrastructure are <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/google-q4-2025-earnings-alphabet-capex-projected-to-double-2026-2">driving revenue and growth across the board</a>.This is a classic growth investor's play. The market's reaction to the capex guidance-shares falling more than 6% in extended trading-highlights the near-term earnings pressure of such a surge. Yet, for a growth-focused lens, that pressure is secondary. The priority is market capture and scalability. By aggressively building out its AI infrastructure, Alphabet aims to overcome the capacity constraints that have limited its ability to fully cash in on AI demand. It's a race against rivals like Microsoft and Amazon, with the three cloud giants collectively expected to spend over $500 billion on AI this year.The bottom line is that Alphabet is prioritizing future dominance over present profits. The $175-$185 billion bet is a commitment to be the foundational layer for the AI economy, leveraging its technological lead and new partnerships-like powering Apple's Siri-to scale its reach. For investors, the question is whether this infrastructure build-out will secure a durable, high-growth moat in the decades ahead.<h2>Market Position and Scalability: The Winner-Take-Most Dynamic</h2>Alphabet's growth trajectory hinges on its ability to climb the cloud market share ladder. Currently, Google Cloud holds <a href="https://www.cargoson.com/en/blog/global-cloud-infrastructure-market-share-aws-azure-google">13% of the global cloud infrastructure market</a>, trailing Amazon Web Services (AWS) at 30% and Microsoft Azure at 20%. While it's third, the company is the fastest-growing major player in a market where the top three control a commanding 63% of the market. This concentration creates a classic winner-take-most dynamic, where scale and infrastructure investment are the primary levers for gaining share.The strategic imperative is clear. To move from 13% to a more competitive position, Google needs to leverage its AI investments to become the most efficient and scalable platform for the next generation of workloads. Its AI infrastructure, built around specialized hardware like TPUs and managed services like Vertex AI, is positioned as a key differentiator. The goal is to offer customers a path to <a href="https://cloud.google.com/ai-infrastructure">scale AI models exponentially</a> while optimizing performance and cost at scale. This could lower unit costs over time, making Google Cloud a more attractive partner for large-scale AI projects.The scalability of this model is what matters most to a growth investor. The total addressable market is enormous, projected to exceed $2.3 trillion by 2032. Within that, the GenAI-specific segment is exploding, with services growing 160% in the second quarter. By pouring its massive capex into this infrastructure, Alphabet aims to capture a disproportionate share of that growth. The Big Three are expected to spend over $500 billion on AI this year; Google's $175-$185 billion bet is a direct attempt to ensure its slice of that pie is large enough to justify the investment and secure long-term dominance. The race is less about today's market share and more about building the foundational layer that will define the AI economy.<h2>The Scalability Equation: Capex to Market Share</h2>The massive capex surge is Alphabet's direct lever to convert its technological lead into market dominance. The math is clear: to capture a larger slice of the cloud pie, you need more infrastructure. Google Cloud's <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/google-parent-alphabet-forecasts-sharp-surge-2026-capital-spending-2026-02-04/">48% revenue growth in the fourth quarter</a> is a powerful signal that its AI investments are resonating with customers. That growth rate far outpaces the overall market's <a href="https://www.cargoson.com/en/blog/global-cloud-infrastructure-market-share-aws-azure-google">25% year-over-year increase</a>, indicating the company is not just riding a wave but actively gaining share. This acceleration is the first step in the scalability equation.The strategy mirrors a necessary arms race. Microsoft and Meta have also ramped spending in 2025, with the three cloud giants collectively expected to shell out more than $500 billion on AI this year. Alphabet's doubling of its own capex is a direct response, aimed at overcoming the capacity constraints that have previously limited its ability to fully cash in on AI demand. By building out its AI infrastructure now, the company is betting it can offer superior scale and efficiency, making Google Cloud the platform of choice for the next generation of workloads. The goal is to leverage this infrastructure to drive exponential scaling of AI models and services, a key differentiator in the market.Yet the primary risk is that this colossal spending does not translate into sustainable market share gains. The path from capex to revenue is not guaranteed. If the infrastructure build-out fails to secure a significant jump in Google Cloud's market share from its current 13%, the investment could lead to prolonged pressure on cash flows and valuation. The market's initial reaction-shares falling more than 6% on the capex news-reflects this concern about payoffs. For the scalability equation to balance, Alphabet must not only spend but also convert that spending into a durable competitive advantage that attracts and retains enterprise customers at scale. The coming quarters will test whether this is a strategic bet on future dominance or a costly overreach.<visualization dataurl="https://cdn.ainvest.com/news/visual/visual_components/viz_wf9n0lxu.json"></visualization><h2>Catalysts, Risks, and What to Watch</h2>The path from Alphabet's massive capex bet to sustained growth is paved with near-term milestones and unresolved uncertainties. For a growth investor, the key is to watch for sequential validation that the spending is translating into market share and revenue acceleration.The most immediate data point is the next earnings reports. Investors need to see Google Cloud's revenue growth remain robust, ideally continuing its <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/google-parent-alphabet-forecasts-sharp-surge-2026-capital-spending-2026-02-04/">48% quarterly surge</a> and outpacing the overall market's <a href="https://www.cargoson.com/en/blog/global-cloud-infrastructure-market-share-aws-azure-google">25% year-over-year increase</a>. Any deceleration would signal that the infrastructure build-out is not yet driving the expected customer adoption. More broadly, the company's ability to maintain its <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/googles-quarterly-results-paint-picture-internet-powerhouse-stronger-129864346">third consecutive quarter of digital ad growth of more than 10%</a> is crucial for funding the AI arms race without straining its balance sheet.A major overhang is the Department of Justice antitrust case. The outcome could significantly impact Google's ability to integrate its AI technologies across its core products and services. A restrictive ruling might limit how effectively the company can leverage its AI lead in search, advertising, and its new partnerships, potentially slowing the growth trajectory that justifies the capex.On the positive catalyst front, two developments are worth close monitoring. First is the rollout of the Apple partnership, which aims to power Siri with Google's Gemini models. This deal unlocks a massive potential user base and could accelerate Google Cloud's adoption if it becomes a seamless part of Apple's ecosystem. Second is the adoption of the Gemini 3 model, which has already shown strong reception and reportedly prompted a "code red" from a rival AI leader. Widespread enterprise adoption of this latest model would be a direct validation of Google's AI platform strength and a potential driver for cloud service usage.The bottom line is that Alphabet is navigating a high-stakes race. The company must convert its $175-$185 billion investment into tangible growth and market share gains, all while facing regulatory scrutiny and intense competition. The coming quarters will provide the first real tests of whether this aggressive build-out is securing a durable, high-growth moat or simply burning cash.

us_high_importance

Market Capitalization

Catalysts Analysis

Top Gainers

Percentage Gains

Movers

Cloud

Artificial Intelligence

Cloud Computing

Alphabet A

Amazon.com

Alphabet's AI Capex Surge: A Growth Investor's View on Market Capture

Bessen says Iran leadership moves a good sign the end may be near

U.S. hedge funds dump software stocks at record speed

Critical Minerals Policy: Market Reacts, Full Impact Ahead

Trump says if a future lease deal ever collapses, he retains the right to militarily secure and reinforce the American presence in Diego Garcia

Crypto market has lost $2 trillion in value since October 2025 peak as selloff deepens - Coingecko data

BREAKING: Lennar and Taylor Morrison's massive rent-to-own plan, 'Trump Homes,' could create $250 billion in housing construction. Stocks surge 5-6% on speculation.

Former NBC Cable President Tom Rogers on Netflix-WBD deal scrutiny, Disney leadership changes

Bitcoin has officially erased post-election gains, now falling to $71,000, its lowest level since November 6th, 2024.

Robinhood Weighs Trump Accounts Role, SpaceX IPO Retail Access Amid Crypto Market Swings

Trump says he had very productive discussions with Prime Minister Keir Starmer on the island of Diego Garcia

GBP/USD one-month options turn most bearish since Dec. 3

U.S. Treasury's Bessen says will take it under consideration whether to sanction Russia's shadow tanker fleet

Iowa American Water's Grant Launch: A Tactical Distraction or a Sentiment Play?

MTSI Breaks Out: Technical Setup and Key Levels to Watch

Bitcoin's Price Pressure: ETF Flows and the $60K Confluence

LPL Financial Plummets 4%: What's Behind the Sudden Drop?

Bitcoin's Liquidity Shock: The $70k Breakdown and Flow Implications

EG's Strategic Portfolio Reset: A Conviction Buy for Quality and Rotation

Spectrum Brands (SPB) Surges 10% on Earnings Beat and Strategic Optimism

Bitcoin's $70k Break: Liquidity Shock vs. Regulatory Stalemate

Aptos Flow Breakdown: Volume Surge, Price Test, and Key Levels

What Insiders Are Doing with Saks Global: A Smart Money Watch

MWA's Q4: Pricing and Efficiency Fuel Margin Expansion and 2026 Guidance

Building a Financial Safety Net: A Simple Plan for Job Loss

Ainvest Option Flow Daily Digest - 2025-09-19 

Buying Oracle Shares Won't Make You As Rich As Larry Ellison, But Not Doing So Will Surely Leave You With Regret 

Micron’s AI Memory Machine Keeps Humming—But the Tape Wants Even More

UBS Sees Tesla Exceeding 500K Q3 Deliveries, New Record Ahead

Latest

Iowa American Water's Grant Launch: A Tactical Distraction or a Sentiment Play?

MTSI Breaks Out: Technical Setup and Key Levels to Watch

Bitcoin's Price Pressure: ETF Flows and the $60K Confluence

LPL Financial Plummets 4%: What's Behind the Sudden Drop?

Bitcoin's Liquidity Shock: The $70k Breakdown and Flow Implications

EG's Strategic Portfolio Reset: A Conviction Buy for Quality and Rotation

Spectrum Brands (SPB) Surges 10% on Earnings Beat and Strategic Optimism

Bitcoin's $70k Break: Liquidity Shock vs. Regulatory Stalemate

Aptos Flow Breakdown: Volume Surge, Price Test, and Key Levels

What Insiders Are Doing with Saks Global: A Smart Money Watch

MWA's Q4: Pricing and Efficiency Fuel Margin Expansion and 2026 Guidance

Building a Financial Safety Net: A Simple Plan for Job Loss

US stocks

Trending tickers

Stocks gainers

Stocks losers

Crypto

Trending cryptos

Crypto gainers

Crypto losers